Introduction to Free Energy - 1 - Zero Point Energy
Part 1 is an introduction to the idea of Zero Point Energy and the first law of Thermodynamics; The Conservation of Energy.
Any intelligent person, when first hearing the concept of “Free Energy” would argue that it goes against the law of conservation of energy. I don’t blame them. I believe the law of Conservation of Energy can not be broken. Energy can not be created or destroyed.
However, TRUE Free Energy devices don’t “create” energy… they are extracting it from another external source… the Zero Point Energy.
This is such a huge subject that there is no way i can squeeze it all into a vlog! But look it up for yourselves and make your own decision.
Think for Yourselves…
Question Everything.
Duration : 0:4:41
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Incredible… your …
Incredible… your reply is absolutly incredible.
But just one referance? Really? ok… hmmm..
Well a good one will be “Modern Thermodynamics” by Kondepudi and Prigogine. Read that then get back to me.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
exactly! I’m the …
exactly! I’m the Physicist, Einstein Disproved the Aether, there is no “Heavy side Or Poynting Flow! I don’t get My Education from Youtube videoes esp from guys claiming the above^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Can you give me any other publication where the above is used by educated people in research? I belong Soceity of Physics Students, American Physicial Soceity and am a student a university with over 3 million books.
point me to one reference and i’ll post it on youtube!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Bizarre… You said …
Bizarre… You said you are a phycisist, yet not only do you deny outright the existance of the aether, but you laugh at heaviside and poynting flow? Then you go on to say Einstein disPROVED the aether when I clearly quote him in this video stating that “space without aether is unthinkable.”
hmmm… well everyone to their own opinion I suppose.
I can’t think of any videos off the top of my head, but I suggest you read a few more books.
I can recommend a few if you want. PM me.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
drude electron gas! …
drude electron gas! christ!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
aether! Einstein …
aether! Einstein disproved the aether with special relativity, hense light’s invariant speed. no aether!
dude please show me a video of this! I don’t care if a guy is playing in a sand box nude rubing rocks together and measuring their voltage…….this stuff is great!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
holy crap! lol you …
holy crap! lol you are something else! non-divergent heavyside flow! poynting flow! lol your just entertaining as hell!!!! I want to see these people and their work. I’m sure it is tin foil hats and energy pyramids all the way! I need some stuff to post up at the physics dept! this is gonna be funny!
show me any research, books, papers, links to pages, other youtube videos that talk about this! your great, an must have absolutely no reguard for being honest.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
However, under …
However, under certain conditions, including sharp gradiants, it is possible to create more interaction between the circuit and the heaviside (which is a componant of the aether) and thus more energy can be used then just the poynting flow.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
As a physicist, I …
As a physicist, I am sure you are aware of the non-divergent heaviside flow. In the classical em model that people are taught in school the non divergent heaviside componant is omitted as it doesn’t interact significantly with the circuit except in the presence of poynting flow which is the flow of the drude electron gas. They omit this even though the larger part of the energy in an electrical circuit is the heaviside by a factor of millions.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
do you really …
do you really believe that arranging you refrigerator magnets together with some wires taps into this?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
in the end energy …
in the end energy is conserved because it is just a mass transfer! still isn’t free! still isn’t over unity, still useless!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
coming from a …
coming from a physicist, your zero point energy comes from a concept in Quantum Mechanics called the Uncertainty Principle. It simply states that we can’t know any measurement for certain! Round about, this leads to the existance of virtual Matter/anti matter particle poping into and out of existance. Steven Hawking relied on this principle to prove Hawking Radiation which radiates mass from black holes. so your virtual particles are there you just need to generate a black hole to use them!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
You are making …
I respect the beauty of the symbol because of its geometry.
You are making assumptions. You do not know why I where a pentagram
and if you want a working device then check out my channel.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Proof. Put up or …
Proof. Put up or shut up. You’ve been talking about zero point for years, now it’s time for a working device. If you can’t come up with one, you have no leg to stand on.
You’re obviously very sincere but your pentagram tells me you aren’t much for critical thought. Why is it that all the zero-point people seem to buy into all sorts of other hoo-ha as well?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Thanks for being on …
Thanks for being on your knee about this subject matter. I’m about to give up proposing people to change their view about law of momentum and energy. Don’t worry, this is what going to happens. Quantum mechanic going to comes up with a new theory for every new phenomena and physics again take all the credits. All the pass crackpots going to remains unrecognized because they’re all predicted in Quantum Mechanic. Why bother my friend.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
What a wonderful …
What a wonderful compliment! Thank you.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Counter intuitive …
Counter intuitive isn’t it ahaha. That’s quantum mechanics.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I find this video …
I find this video probably to be the most accurate delivery of the concept of free energy, (or as we scientist like people enjoy calling it, Zero point energy or even dark energy… meh there just words, it’s description that counts) in the sense that it doesn’t say your energy coming out of nowhere. It’s just coming out of a previously not well know, or indeed unknown, source. Keep it up introvertebrate. Lack of clarity is plaguing the public’s general understanding of science.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
that is so dumb.. …
that is so dumb.. zero point energy as he describes it could not in any universe exist..space is a void except for the energy passing thru it or matter that has been releast into it from stars, planets and interstellar dust etc. .. the idea that space / the universe has mass of it’s own like some great sheet everything rolls around on is so contrary to observation and logic.. where Enstein and others get this fabric of space and mass / gravity warping space goes against reason
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
yup , Thanks i …
yup , Thanks i noticed it after i
had already hit the post comment button, so couldn’t edit it, but in my defense
i just finished waking and baking LOL
KJ
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
ha ha you mean ” …
“adam and eve” is rhyming slang for “believe”
ha ha you mean “atom” of course
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
lets put it this …
lets put it this way
if u split zero point energy like we split an adam , it would make the adam bomb look like a FireCracker!!!
Hope this helps ya understand the magnitude
of zero point. And it exists everywhere, even where there is nothing!!!
Problem is Harnessing that Energy in my believe.
KJ
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
how can that be? …
how can that be? think about it….one square centimeter has more energy than a universe of infinite square centimeters! …give God some credit?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
who made up these ” …
who made up these “laws” ? get off your knees man and look up in the sky! the sun free…
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
fyi Dark matter and …
fyi Dark matter and dark energy used to be called “The Zero Point Energy Field” before the consensus changed it. The reason? To make it a little more vague other than something you can extract energy from.
Interesting eh?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Exxon, Warburg and …
Exxon, Warburg and Rothschild don’t want’t you to know it :).
Einstein was a Yiddish speaking Ashkenazi ?
Was Einstein another Zionist fraud ?