Helix Wind Turbine
The Helix Wind Turbine is a grid tie or off grid power system. For more information please visit the company web site. http://www.helixwind.com
Duration : 0:2:30
[youtube q9flSPAdOLk]
Zero-Point Recovery
A bridge to Zero-Point Energy
RSS Feed
25 Responses to “Helix Wind Turbine”
Leave a Reply
You Can Build It!
Magnets For Energy
Build a permanent magnet motor.
Categories
- Bio-fuels
- Energy recovery systems
- Energy technologies
- Free energy
- Geothermal energy
- Hydrogen from water
- New energy sources
- Nicoli Tesla
- Notions From Science Fiction
- Permanent magnet motors
- Solar energy
- Tidal water energy
- Uncategorized
- Wind power
- Zero-point energy
Pages
Archives
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
Recent Posts
- Zero-Point Recovery Systems.
- what would the military applications of zero-point energy be?
- Alternate Energy Sources For Your Home
- What direction does zero-point energy flow?
- What total solar cell area would you need to provide energy needs? Mastering Physics problem?
- In the future, will the use of electricity be nearly gone? Will the new source energy be free?
- we can use hydrogen as a fuel for car,so y can’t we get hydroden from water(h2from h2o)by cuttin o2 ?
- What is the difference between standard gibbs free energy change and gibbs free energy change?
- Shouldn’t we pursue the resources available to us while advancing new energy technologies?
- Debate – Bio-Fuels will Result in World Famine?
Recent Comments
- Bekki B on what would the military applications of zero-point energy be?
- blueridgemotors on what would the military applications of zero-point energy be?
- usawatertech on what would the military applications of zero-point energy be?
- rhsaunders on what would the military applications of zero-point energy be?
- jaws on we can use hydrogen as a fuel for car,so y can’t we get hydroden from water(h2from h2o)by cuttin o2 ?
- Richard on we can use hydrogen as a fuel for car,so y can’t we get hydroden from water(h2from h2o)by cuttin o2 ?
- Israel Lover on we can use hydrogen as a fuel for car,so y can’t we get hydroden from water(h2from h2o)by cuttin o2 ?
- Crystal Waker on we can use hydrogen as a fuel for car,so y can’t we get hydroden from water(h2from h2o)by cuttin o2 ?
- MrWizard on Debate – Bio-Fuels will Result in World Famine?
- David on In the future, will the use of electricity be nearly gone? Will the new source energy be free?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Simply build 5 or …
Simply build 5 or 15 or 100 after another and you’ll the power you want!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
It’s quieter and …
It’s quieter and catches wind no matter what direction it moves?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I see several wind …
I see several wind turbine design on youtube, including different models from one single inventor, which have a company. What is the more effective?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
its a gorgeous …
its a gorgeous thing!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I need one now!
I need one now!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I’ve got a few …
I’ve got a few films tackling various issues on wind power…
And please do pass the link around
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Like to see how …
Like to see how those’d work for industrial use
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
doesnt look …
doesnt look efficient
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
They are storing …
They are storing the “waste” in Floria, and setting policy to burn up oil at breakneck speeds. The US will have a corner on the Nuke market within two decades. DUH
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
so lets see here. …
so lets see here. its in the middle of the desert no rain under a mountain miles upon miles from any city. wtf are you talking about?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
haha how so ive …
haha how so ive seen vids of actual nuclear waste in a mock trainwreck, which was a pretty nasty wreck btw, then it was set on fire with no leakage. its not like cartoons where they transport it in a barrel and is prone to leakage. true it would have been devastating without proper safety to prevent it. i would think by now we are smarter than that
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Birds just wont fly …
Birds just wont fly on it. Bird-friendly yes, but what about the bugs? hmmm. I like this one better!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
fantastic
fantastic
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
o my yes its safer …
o my yes its safer for the birds! good god whats next?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
ya that was an …
ya that was an interesting claim. if you put a screen around it would work too
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I don’t understand …
I don’t understand how it’s safe for birds?
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
In France, They …
In France, They recycle their spent fuel rods, and reuse them until there is almost nothing left. The United States should do that too, Instead of burying them. I don’t know why you guys are so paranoid about nuclear waste… There are thousands of things all around you that emit radiation. Even down to just a simple bag of fertilizer. It doesn’t take much at all to contain radioactive materials. few inches of lead, few feet of dirt.. seriously. A household microwave is far more scary.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
The problem with …
The problem with nuclear waste is the transportation to the storage facility. I find the idea of trucks and trains carrying this dangerous cargo all over the country very scary. Yesterday a big rig crashed off the Chesapeake Bay Bridge in Maryland and landed in the bay. If the had contained nuclear waste it would have been devastating.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Derlambic. I fail …
Derlambic. I fail to see how nuclear waste buried deep underground in monitored chambers could affect future generations. It’s a technology that will be used no matter what. It is unstoppable. So it’s better that we provide the best safety measures possible now to assure its containment. The future generations you speak of will still be using nuclear power anyway, but by then I assume they’ll be able to dispose of their waste in space.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Nuclear waste …
Nuclear waste remains dangerous for 360000 years. How can you guarantee safe storage for such a long period? The coming 100000 generations will paying for the electricity for our large screen TV’s .
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
Let’s keep the …
Let’s keep the debate about the issue though. I appreciate you taking my side but it’s not a mud-slinging fest here…or at least I didn’t intend for it to be.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
natemoore is a …
natemoore is a close minded individual that has made the country that i love what it is today there are millions of natemoores all over this country and refuse to leave their old comfortable ways with their big wheel trucks and their Bush/Chaney bumper stickers. natemoore doesnt change until he is affected directly, but until then natemoore is set in his ways no matter what bites him, or at least bites his dog.I bet untill this war started most natemoores didnt even know were Iraq was.comon!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
It’s amazing to me …
It’s amazing to me how many reasons people can try to come up with to prevent technology from further development.
Think about this hypothetical situation. What if we could get 50% of our electricity from wind power combined with use of solar panels? What is the real problem with that? Why do you try to stop it?
The only way to deny this new technology’s benefits is to claim that our use of fossil fuels has not affected the earth’s climate, and yes, that is a right wing partisan view.
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
I love how as you …
I love how as you tell us that it is wrong to lump environmentalists in with the “green religion”
But then, later on, anyone who doesn’t become more educated (and by educated, I am sure you mean “agrees with my point of view”)is a right wing partisan.
A million says your voting Obama!
September 5th, 2008 at 1:06 am
First of all, you …
First of all, you should abandon the idea that people who try to keep the environment clean belong to the “green religion.” That’s a pretty weak attempt to marginalize the debate but it’s really something that all people should be aware of.
Also, use of imagery such as “touching the papal robe” and things the “green religion” can do to “appease their gods” shows that you haven’t really been becoming educated to be less ignorant but rather to become more right wing partisan.