Magnets For EnergyHelix Wind Turbine
Written by admin on September 5, 2008 – 1:06 am -
The Helix Wind Turbine is a grid tie or off grid power system. For more information please visit the company web site. http://www.helixwind.com
Duration : 0:2:30
Tags: alternative, clean, electricity, energy, global, green, grid, helix, power, renewable, solar, turbine, VAWT, vertical, warming, wind
Posted in Wind power | 25 Comments »
By Nichen on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Simply build 5 or …
Simply build 5 or 15 or 100 after another and you’ll the power you want!
By MtBlu on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
It’s quieter and …
It’s quieter and catches wind no matter what direction it moves?
By jerryaltman on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
I see several wind …
I see several wind turbine design on youtube, including different models from one single inventor, which have a company. What is the more effective?
By waaaaam on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
its a gorgeous …
its a gorgeous thing!
By VanHalenRulz on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
I need one now!
I need one now!
By windpowerrocks on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
I’ve got a few …
I’ve got a few films tackling various issues on wind power…
And please do pass the link around
By GreatMelancholy on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Like to see how …
Like to see how those’d work for industrial use
By hardcoretyp123 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
doesnt look …
doesnt look efficient
By BanjoNaps on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
They are storing …
They are storing the “waste” in Floria, and setting policy to burn up oil at breakneck speeds. The US will have a corner on the Nuke market within two decades. DUH
By cruxbucket on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
so lets see here. …
so lets see here. its in the middle of the desert no rain under a mountain miles upon miles from any city. wtf are you talking about?
By cruxbucket on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
haha how so ive …
haha how so ive seen vids of actual nuclear waste in a mock trainwreck, which was a pretty nasty wreck btw, then it was set on fire with no leakage. its not like cartoons where they transport it in a barrel and is prone to leakage. true it would have been devastating without proper safety to prevent it. i would think by now we are smarter than that
By jamescgale on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Birds just wont fly …
Birds just wont fly on it. Bird-friendly yes, but what about the bugs? hmmm. I like this one better!
By clintrocks69 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
fantastic
fantastic
By thunderbirdlver on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
o my yes its safer …
o my yes its safer for the birds! good god whats next?
By TBONER069 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
ya that was an …
ya that was an interesting claim. if you put a screen around it would work too
By Deciheximal on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
I don’t understand …
I don’t understand how it’s safe for birds?
By irisauser on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
In France, They …
In France, They recycle their spent fuel rods, and reuse them until there is almost nothing left. The United States should do that too, Instead of burying them. I don’t know why you guys are so paranoid about nuclear waste… There are thousands of things all around you that emit radiation. Even down to just a simple bag of fertilizer. It doesn’t take much at all to contain radioactive materials. few inches of lead, few feet of dirt.. seriously. A household microwave is far more scary.
By pimlico721 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
The problem with …
The problem with nuclear waste is the transportation to the storage facility. I find the idea of trucks and trains carrying this dangerous cargo all over the country very scary. Yesterday a big rig crashed off the Chesapeake Bay Bridge in Maryland and landed in the bay. If the had contained nuclear waste it would have been devastating.
By pinkundaztood on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Derlambic. I fail …
Derlambic. I fail to see how nuclear waste buried deep underground in monitored chambers could affect future generations. It’s a technology that will be used no matter what. It is unstoppable. So it’s better that we provide the best safety measures possible now to assure its containment. The future generations you speak of will still be using nuclear power anyway, but by then I assume they’ll be able to dispose of their waste in space.
By derlambic on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Nuclear waste …
Nuclear waste remains dangerous for 360000 years. How can you guarantee safe storage for such a long period? The coming 100000 generations will paying for the electricity for our large screen TV’s .
By kurre7 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
Let’s keep the …
Let’s keep the debate about the issue though. I appreciate you taking my side but it’s not a mud-slinging fest here…or at least I didn’t intend for it to be.
By cdron78 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
natemoore is a …
natemoore is a close minded individual that has made the country that i love what it is today there are millions of natemoores all over this country and refuse to leave their old comfortable ways with their big wheel trucks and their Bush/Chaney bumper stickers. natemoore doesnt change until he is affected directly, but until then natemoore is set in his ways no matter what bites him, or at least bites his dog.I bet untill this war started most natemoores didnt even know were Iraq was.comon!
By kurre7 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
It’s amazing to me …
It’s amazing to me how many reasons people can try to come up with to prevent technology from further development.
Think about this hypothetical situation. What if we could get 50% of our electricity from wind power combined with use of solar panels? What is the real problem with that? Why do you try to stop it?
The only way to deny this new technology’s benefits is to claim that our use of fossil fuels has not affected the earth’s climate, and yes, that is a right wing partisan view.
By PosVibeMerc on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
I love how as you …
I love how as you tell us that it is wrong to lump environmentalists in with the “green religion”
But then, later on, anyone who doesn’t become more educated (and by educated, I am sure you mean “agrees with my point of view”)is a right wing partisan.
A million says your voting Obama!
By kurre7 on Sep 5, 2008 | Reply
First of all, you …
First of all, you should abandon the idea that people who try to keep the environment clean belong to the “green religion.” That’s a pretty weak attempt to marginalize the debate but it’s really something that all people should be aware of.
Also, use of imagery such as “touching the papal robe” and things the “green religion” can do to “appease their gods” shows that you haven’t really been becoming educated to be less ignorant but rather to become more right wing partisan.